![\"\"](\"http:\/\/en.bornomalanews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/China_nov_nov_nov-300x225.jpg\")
International Desk: China has long stoked and sustained borderland disputes as a tactic to win concessions on wider issues with its neighbours, according to strategic expert Bertil Lintner.<\/p>\nInternational Desk: China has long stoked and sustained borderland disputes as a tactic to win concessions on wider issues with its neighbours, according to strategic expert Bertil Lintner.<\/p>\n
While recalling the 1962 India-China war and recent cash in Ladakh region, Lintner, in an opinion piece for Asia Times, questions \u201cwhether China is really looking for a solution to that long-standing and often bitter border dispute, or if maintaining fuzzy borders is a deliberate tool in Beijing\u2019s foreign policy to negotiate better terms on trade, security and other issues with its neighbours.\u201d<\/p>\n
The analyst says that with Beijing\u2019s recent rise from a developing world backwater to a superpower competing for global influence with the United States, China\u2019s borders have appeared to become more tumultuous, adding that those issues are now arguably most acute with India.<\/p>\n
\u201cApart from controlling a western Himalayan area known as Aksai Chin, which India considers its territory, China lays claims to most of the northeastern Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh. After China annexed Tibet in the early 1950s, it has also had border disputes with Bhutan, the only neighbouring country with which Beijing does not maintain formal diplomatic relations,\u201d Lintner writes.<\/p>\n
Citing another example of China\u2019s smaller neighbour Nepal, Lintner writes that \u201cUntil now, China and Nepal had only one major boundary dispute, namely over the height of Mt Everest, which China says is 8,844 meters, while Nepal claims it is 8,848 meters. But, in September, the two countries became engaged in a boundary row after the Chinese erected 11 buildings inside what Nepal claims is its territory and part of the western district of Humla.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lintner, argues that Beijing won\u2019t shy away from picking a fight with the likes of Russia. \u201cA border dispute in China\u2019s north led to a brief war in 1969 with the then Soviet Union. Ostensibly, the conflict was over some islands on the Ussuri River, but it was really about China flexing its muscles against what was then its main adversary and rival within the communist camp,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
He further recalls, \u201cIn July this year, Chinese diplomats, journalists and assorted nationalists took to the Internet to remind people of the fact that the Russian city of Vladivostok once was Chinese, known as Haishenwai. It became Russian only after \u201can unequal treaty\u201d \u2014 China\u2019s name for old treaties which it believes were to its disadvantage \u2013concluded in the 1860s.\u201d<\/p>\n
The report in Asia Times by Lintner further states that China wants to stir up a border dispute with Moscow to assert leverage in negotiations on several issues including import of gas from the Russian Far East.<\/p>\n
Coming back to India, the strategic thinker states that amid the approaching winter season in the Himalayan region, Beijing may not be interested in escalating the situation, however, it is not looking for a permanent solution for border either.<\/p>\n
Lintner says that \u201cborder disputes is how China flexes its regional hegemony and wins diplomatic leverage in wider negotiations with its various neighbours. And while tensions may flare up from time to time, the disputes are seldom actually about territory but rather an expression of power in a worldview where China sees itself as the Middle Kingdom.\u201d<\/p>\n
Source : ANI<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
International Desk: China has long stoked and sustained borderland disputes as a tactic to win concessions on wider issues with its neighbours, according to strategic expert Bertil Lintner. While recalling the 1962 India-China war and recent cash in Ladakh region, Lintner, in an opinion piece for Asia Times, questions \u201cwhether China is really looking for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":64167,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2,14],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\t\n